A beginner acceptance check for a browsing tool
Redaily
4/14/2025
Updated
Installed successfully and completed the task are different outcomes. Evaluate installation, sign-in, configuration, execution, stopping and record inspection.
Use one target with simple conditions, compare actions with configuration, then stop and check the state. If exporting, open the downloaded file. Keep failed checks rather than using one success screenshot to cover everything.
Dramatic before-and-after claims without comparison are poor evidence. A precise conclusion can be: target page opened, browse records exist, commenting remains unverified.
First-use acceptance table
| Action | Expected evidence |
|---|---|
| Install/enable | Correct name and version in Chrome |
| Login/region | Product and platform sessions both work |
| Save | Reopened configuration matches |
| Start/browse | Correct target page and observable actions |
| Stop | State changes and the run is recorded |
| Export if needed | Download opens with expected fields and scope |
Include failures in the conclusion
Mark untested steps unverified and preserve minimal reproductions for errors. Do not declare everything passed and hide failures with later work. Website availability or successful installation alone does not verify login, comments, schedules or collection.
Product reference
Product steps were checked against extension 3.5.3. See the related guide for instructions and pricing for access. Report behavior that differs through feedback, including the version and a redacted error.
