Automated comments versus AI input assistance

Automated workflows and the manual AI helper can both use generated wording, but their publication timing differs. Choosing the wrong mode can mean expecting approval after a workflow has already begun sending.

Manual assistance: open a post, generate candidates, insert one, edit and send yourself. A workflow follows saved targets, filters and comment settings and can publish directly. Disable workflow comments when each message needs review.

Check facts and context in both modes. Avoid invented purchase experiences and repeated unrelated promotion.

Configure automatic sending in order

Create the relevant workflow, choose targets and filters, then enable Pro commenting. Select existing text for custom mode or a current style/persona for AI. Review suffixes, save and observe actual results on a small scope.

Ask about a specific detail

Nice and looks good do not identify what you are responding to. If you are genuinely asking about a coat in the second outfit, ask a specific detail missing from the post. If there is no second outfit or the answer already appears, that sentence is inappropriate too. It is not a template for every post.

Manual candidates instead follow generate, compare, insert, edit and send yourself. Inspect final text in either path. For successful generation but failed publication, check the website notice. No fixed daily quota or universal uniqueness promise is established here.

Product reference

Product steps were checked against extension 3.5.3. See the related guide for instructions and pricing for access. Report behavior that differs through feedback, including the version and a redacted error.