Using DeepSeek for comments: context, candidates and review

DeepSeek generates text from post or comment context in Redaily; it does not analyze or control the recommendation algorithm. Requests pass through the product server and OpenRouter rather than running offline in your browser.

Read the post, choose a style or persona, then check candidates for real details, invented personal experience and unrelated promotion. Remove statements you cannot verify.

The manual helper inserts your selected candidate into the input for review and sending. Workflow AI comments can publish automatically. Disable automated commenting when you need individual review. Both AI and custom automated comments require Pro.

Review an Ask-for-details candidate

Suppose a post describes a wardrobe shelf and already states its width. Asking for the width adds nothing. A genuinely needed installation constraint not covered by the post is a better question. This is a review example, not a claimed user result.

1. List questions already answered by the source.
2. Mark repeated questions, invented experience and unrelated suggestions in candidates.
3. Retain wording tied to the material, or rewrite it completely.
4. Read the final inserted text, including any suffix, before sending.

Separate generation from publication errors

No candidates calls for checking login, Pro and the AI error. Candidates that fail to enter the box suggest a page-control issue. If text is already inserted, check whether you still need to send it. A successful model request is not evidence of publication, and repeated generation does not resolve a posting restriction.

Product reference

Product steps were checked against extension 3.5.3. See the related guide for instructions and pricing for access. Report behavior that differs through feedback, including the version and a redacted error.