How beginners can distinguish platform rules from operating advice

Claims labeled new rules, mandatory steps or golden formulas need sources. The former article supplied no verifiable original notice for its March rule claim, so that assertion has been removed.

For a requirement, locate the platform notice, publication date, affected account types and effective conditions. Personal experience can suggest a hypothesis but is not policy. Avoid broad operational changes based on an unsourced claim.

For product tutorials, check version, real access and runtime requirements. Resolve restrictions through platform notices; tool advertising is not evidence of policy exemptions or safety.

Restore context around must-do claims

Ask who issued the statement, where the original is, when it takes effect and which accounts/actions it covers. Campaigns, advertising and ordinary publishing can have different scopes. Do not strip conditions from one notice and apply it universally.

Record advice and rules separately

An editorial suggestion can explain that an extra step image would clarify an answer. A rule needs its source. Comments do not need an invented minimum word count, and emotional phrasing does not establish compliance.

Without original evidence, retain a question for verification instead of increasing automation. For actual restrictions, follow the account notice and preserve it. A tool described as professional does not replace checking behavioral requirements.

Product reference

Product steps were checked against extension 3.5.3. See the related guide for instructions and pricing for access. Report behavior that differs through feedback, including the version and a redacted error.